Conservation and reclamation agencies · Minnesota

Conservation Corps MN & IA

Name: Conservation Corps MN & IA Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Saint Paul, MN · ~215 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 12.6
Avg TCR: 3.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Conservation Corps MN & IA runs at 395% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade F.

Conservation Corps MN & IA: 12.6 TCR = 395% of Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Conservation Corps MN & IA safety composite

Conservation Corps MN & IA scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 12.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers
DART rate: F 5.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−46.9

2022→2024

Conservation Corps MN & IA injury rate improved

Conservation Corps MN & IA's TCR fell 46.9 from 59.5 in 2022 to 12.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 82.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=59.5 · 2023=82.5 · 2024=12.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Saint Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.6 · 395% of ind

DART 5.2 DART
RANK #43/45
PHOTO Fresno PARCS
BOOK 3y book
INJ 139 inj
SIZE ~215 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fresno PARCS (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Fresno PARCS

12.8
Chevy Chase RC

12.8
This site

12.6
Highlands Recr

12.4
City of Goldsb

12.4

What this shows Conservation Corps MN & IA averages 12.6 TCR (395% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark).

Conservation Corps MN & IA TCR series: 2022=59.5 · 2023=82.5 · 2024=12.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Conservation Corps MN & IA falls in its industry

413 Conservation and reclamation a establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 45 Conservation and reclamation a employers in Minnesota.

Conservation Corps MN & IA (215 employees, TCR 12.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Conservation Corps MN & IA has more employees than the Conservation and reclamation agencies median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2024	12.6	5.2	25	2
2023	82.5	34.4	25	11
2022	59.5	3.3	89	20

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MN · Saint Paul

413 Conservation and reclamation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Fresno PARCS	FRESNO, CA	12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Chevy Chase RC	LOS ANGELES, CA	12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Highlands Recreation District	SAN MATEO, CA	12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR	City of Goldsboro/ Maintenance Division	GOLDSBORO, NC	12.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE	STERIS Plymouth 14905 Facility	PLYMOUTH	215 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Con-Tech Manufacturing, Inc. Dodge Center	DODGE CENTER	215 FTE
STATE-SIZE	0657 - Bemidji	BEMIDJI	215 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Prime Now LLC - UMN1	MINNEAPOLIS	215 FTE
CITY-NEAR	HE-Midway Corporate Campus	Saint Paul	2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Minnesota Department of Public Safety	Saint Paul	2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule	Saint Paul	1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR	FV St Josephs Hospital	Saint Paul	1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR	Titus - Cleveland	Cleveland, TN	12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Costa Solutions - Valvoline	Houston, TX	12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Wisconsin	Columbus, WI	12.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	The Laurels of Summit Ridge	Asheville, NC	12.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	AMCOR Flexibles North America	Centerville, IA	215 FTE
NAT-SIZE	PET Plant - Bottles	Atlanta, GA	215 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Barnett Millworks, Inc.	Theodore, AL	215 FTE
NAT-SIZE	QLS Apollo	Apollo, PA	215 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.