Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Arizona

Constant Aviation- IWA

Mesa, AZ · ~43 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Constant Aviation- IWA runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Constant Aviation- IWA: 0.5 TCR = 11% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Constant Aviation- IWA safety composite

Constant Aviation- IWA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Constant Aviation- IWA held a steady TCR band

Constant Aviation- IWA's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Mesa, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/30
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Vandenberg AFB (3985) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Constant Aviation- IWA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Constant Aviation- IWA averages 0.5 TCR (11% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Constant Aviation- IWA TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Constant Aviation- IWA falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 30 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Arizona.

Constant Aviation- IWA (43 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Constant Aviation- IWA
Constant Aviation- IWA (43 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Constant Aviation- IWA has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · AZ · Mesa

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 565 employers in Mesa, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Vandenberg AFB (3985) 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eulen Aviation TPA Station 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 163 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Eglin AFB FL-1107 Luton Dr (3715) 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Excelsior Mining AZ 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache Junction 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMS Construction, LLC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrity Building Corp 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZ001 4,193 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZAPW9668 AZA - RAMP PAX 3,181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 04-290370278-2 1,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Police Department H210 1,651 FTE
NAT-TCR Methanex USA, LLC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Nestle Waters North America - Ozarka 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cameron V&M 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Fiat Chrysler Automobiles- Indiana Transmission Plant 1 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE IsleChem, LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haleakala Labor Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carbro Constructors Corp Main 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kevin Williams 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.