Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing · Minnesota
CONSTRUCTION
St. Louis Park, MN · ~45 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 14.1
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
CONSTRUCTION runs at 427% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 14.1
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 4
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares CONSTRUCTION's OSHA Total Case Rate of 14.1 to the Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (427% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
CONSTRUCTION's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where CONSTRUCTION falls in its industry
880 Highway bridge sections, prefa establishmentsSafer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 39 Highway bridge sections, prefa employers in Minnesota.
Trend analysis for CONSTRUCTION
Between 2018 and 2019, CONSTRUCTION's Total Case Rate worsened from 13.3 to 14.9 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 12% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 13.3, while 2019 saw the highest rate, at 14.9, a spread of 1.6 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, CONSTRUCTION recorded 4 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 4 injuries, 3 illnesses shown on this page for CONSTRUCTION are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 332999 - Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2019)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
1 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 40,329 hours worked = 4.96 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CONSTRUCTION (this establishment) | 14.10 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Machine bases, metal, manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 332999 |
| Minnesota state avg (all industries) | 5.18 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by CONSTRUCTION to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2019: 3 reportable incidents · 1 injuries, 2 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 4 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 1 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 14.9 | 5.0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| 2018 | 13.3 | 10.0 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on CONSTRUCTION's reported OSHA injury record versus its Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 427% of the Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing benchmark, CONSTRUCTION reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Highway bridge sections, prefabricated metal, manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CONSTRUCTION's safety grade?
How many injuries has CONSTRUCTION reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Minnesota, and by nearby establishments in St. Louis Park - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~14.1)
Similar size (~45 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.