Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing · Missouri

Control Devices Carr Lane

Saint Louis, MO · ~38 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Control Devices Carr Lane runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Control Devices Carr Lane: 2.0 TCR = 60% of Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Control Devices Carr Lane safety composite

Control Devices Carr Lane scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2022→2024

Control Devices Carr Lane injury rate improved

Control Devices Carr Lane's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.8 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Saint Louis, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/7
  • PHOTO Curtiss Wright Farri…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Curtiss Wright Farris Engineering (10195 Brecksville) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Control Devices Carr Lane in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Control Devices Carr Lane averages 2.0 TCR (60% of the Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Control Devices Carr Lane TCR series: 2022=2.8 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Control Devices Carr Lane falls in its industry

298 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 7 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., employers in Missouri.

Control Devices Carr Lane (38 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Control Devices Carr Lane
Control Devices Carr Lane (38 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Control Devices Carr Lane has fewer employees than the Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, ga median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2022 2.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · MO · Saint Louis

298 Valves, industrial-type (e.g., check, gate, globe, relief, safety), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 448 employers in Saint Louis, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Curtiss Wright Farris Engineering (10195 Brecksville) 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waterous Company 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FlowSafe 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Armstrong International - Three Rivers Division 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMEREN SERVICES - Telecom Field Ops - AIC 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Webster Electric Cooperative 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Springs Service Center 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR MO002 12,691 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barnes-Jewish Hospital 9,005 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL ST LOUIS 5,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR Checkerboard Square 3,464 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 4811 - Clearwater Avenue 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Glencoe Minnesota 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CHAE Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S11004 - Orange MRF 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Time Mark Corporation 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE WSN-ODFL 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Branch 3854 - Queens 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Matrix Realty Inc. 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.