Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing · New Jersey

Control Instruments Corp

Fairfield, NJ · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Control Instruments Corp runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Control Instruments Corp: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Control Instruments Corp safety composite

Control Instruments Corp scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2017→2024

Control Instruments Corp injury rate improved

Control Instruments Corp's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Fairfield, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO Monitor Technologies…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Monitor Technologies LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Control Instruments Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Control Instruments Corp averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Control Instruments Corp TCR series: 2017=3.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Control Instruments Corp falls in its industry

322 Measuring instruments, industr establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Measuring instruments, industr employers in New Jersey.

Control Instruments Corp (30 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Control Instruments Corp
Control Instruments Corp (30 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Control Instruments Corp has fewer employees than the Measuring instruments, industrial proces median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.9 3.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · NJ · Fairfield

322 Measuring instruments, industrial process control-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 88 employers in Fairfield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Monitor Technologies LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Honeywell Solutions Center Houston 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rosemount Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Golden Valley 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Washington TWP MUA 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Martin Group 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1127 - BELFOR Northern New Jersey NJ 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Inc - Newark 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Middle Atlantic Products-Fairfield 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legrand AV Inc. 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1175 - Fairfield 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weiss-Aug Surgical Products 241 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 308 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Unwrapped Inc 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Diversified Opportunities, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Villa Redondo 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond Marine Terminal 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joshua Basin Water District 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pacific County PUD #2 Raymond 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.