Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Indiana

Honeywell Aerospace

South Bend, IN · ~425 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell Aerospace runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honeywell Aerospace: 0.5 TCR = 15% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell Aerospace safety composite

Honeywell Aerospace scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2021→2024

Honeywell Aerospace injury rate improved

Honeywell Aerospace's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.6 in 2021 to 0.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.6 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · South Bend, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #1/9
  • PHOTO FTI Manufacturing
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~425 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FTI Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Honeywell Aerospace in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honeywell Aerospace averages 0.5 TCR (15% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honeywell Aerospace TCR series: 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Honeywell Aerospace falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 9 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Indiana.

Honeywell Aerospace (425 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Honeywell Aerospace
Honeywell Aerospace (425 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Honeywell Aerospace has more employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.2 0.2 0 1 0
2023 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.9 0.4 4 0 0
2021 0.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · IN · South Bend

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 318 employers in South Bend, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FTI Manufacturing 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bowhead Mission Solutions 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Securaplane Technologies 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Albany Engineered Composites 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cook Polymer Technology 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flaherty & Collins Inc 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE Indianapolis Zoo 425 FTE
STATE-SIZE IEA-C 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital South Bend 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Joseph County 1,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fourwinds Casino South Bend 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR Honeywell IN08 810 FTE
NAT-TCR Aero-Plastics, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Foremark Performance Chemicals 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Frazee Vergas Public Schools - Elementary 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont Development and Environmental Services 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HNE1 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hostess Brands LLC- Columbus 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wagman Heavy Civil, Inc. 425 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Fruit and Produce 425 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.