Agricultural cooperative extension program administration · California
Cooperative Agricultural Support Service
Sacramento, CA · ~299 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 8.5
- Avg TCR
- 3.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Cooperative Agricultural Support Service runs at 266% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural cooperative extension program administration workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 8.5
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.2
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 46
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Cooperative Agricultural Support Service's OSHA Total Case Rate of 8.5 to the Agricultural cooperative extension program administration BLS benchmark of 3.2 (266% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Cooperative Agricultural Support Service's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.2 industry benchmark.
Where Cooperative Agricultural Support Service falls in its industry
31 Agricultural cooperative exten establishmentsSafer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 20 Agricultural cooperative exten employers in California.
Trend analysis for Cooperative Agricultural Support Service
Between 2018 and 2019, Cooperative Agricultural Support Service's Total Case Rate worsened from 5.8 to 11.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 95% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 5.8, while 2019 saw the highest rate, at 11.3, a spread of 5.5 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Cooperative Agricultural Support Service recorded 46 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 46 injuries, 7 illnesses shown on this page for Cooperative Agricultural Support Service are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 926140 - Agricultural cooperative extension program administration.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2019)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
21 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 549,995 hours worked = 7.64 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cooperative Agricultural Support Service (this establishment) | 8.52 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Food inspection agencies industry avg | 3.20 | BLS IIF, NAICS 926140 |
| California state avg (all industries) | 5.64 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Cooperative Agricultural Support Service to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2019: 31 reportable incidents · 27 injuries, 4 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2018: 22 reportable incidents · 19 injuries, 3 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 11.3 | 7.6 | 27 | 4 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5.8 | 5.5 | 19 | 3 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Cooperative Agricultural Support Service's reported OSHA injury record versus its Agricultural cooperative extension program administration peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 266% of the Agricultural cooperative extension program administration benchmark, Cooperative Agricultural Support Service reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Agricultural cooperative extension program administration sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cooperative Agricultural Support Service's safety grade?
How many injuries has Cooperative Agricultural Support Service reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within California, and by nearby establishments in Sacramento - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~8.5)
Similar size (~299 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.