Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing · Connecticut

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc.

Thomaston, CT · ~58 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. runs at 659% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc.: 21.8 TCR = 659% of Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. safety composite

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc.: 16.6 → 26.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 26.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.25× in 2023

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc.'s TCR rose 10.3 from 16.6 in 2022 to 26.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327390 · Thomaston, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.8 · 659% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #9/9
  • PHOTO Stone Building Produ…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stone Building Products, LLC d/b/a Signature Stone (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. averages 21.8 TCR (659% of the Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. TCR series: 2022=16.6 · 2023=26.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. falls in its industry

790 Architectural wall panels, pre establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 9 Architectural wall panels, pre employers in Connecticut.

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. (58 employees, TCR 21.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc.
Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. (58 employees, TCR 21.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Coreslab Structures (Conn.) Inc. has more employees than the Architectural wall panels, precast concr median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 26.9 5.4 13 2 0
2022 16.6 1.7 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327390 · CT · Thomaston

790 Architectural wall panels, precast concrete, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 16 employers in Thomaston, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stone Building Products, LLC d/b/a Signature Stone 21.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tunnel - Londonderry 21.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prestressed - Ozark 22.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Construction Products, LLC of Tennessee 21.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nations Roof of New England 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Brandford 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE STRAN Technologies IT Services, LLC 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE A&B Mechanical LLC 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silgan Dispensing Systems Thomaston 205 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ward Leonard CT LLC 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town of Thomaston 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stewart EFI CT 112 FTE
NAT-TCR 6458-ZWAN 21.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PFF 21.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Animal Humane Society - CR 21.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Whaley Foodservice-Raleigh 21.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dustcom Limited, Inc 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE IA Alcoholic Beverages Division 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store Construction & Maintenance 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross Plumbing 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.