Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · California

Cortec Precision sheetmetal

San Jose, CA · ~380 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cortec Precision sheetmetal runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Cortec Precision sheetmetal: 7.5 TCR = 228% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cortec Precision sheetmetal safety composite

Cortec Precision sheetmetal scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−29.3

2018→2024

Cortec Precision sheetmetal injury rate improved

Cortec Precision sheetmetal's TCR fell 29.3 from 32.0 in 2018 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5494.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=32.0 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=5494.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · San Jose, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.5 · 228% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #73/98
  • PHOTO DOT Metals
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 130 inj
  • SIZE ~380 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DOT Metals (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Cortec Precision sheetmetal in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cortec Precision sheetmetal averages 7.5 TCR (228% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cortec Precision sheetmetal TCR series: 2018=32 · 2019=6.7 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=5494.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Cortec Precision sheetmetal falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #73 safest of 98 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in California.

Cortec Precision sheetmetal (380 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cortec Precision sheetmetal
Cortec Precision sheetmetal (380 employees, TCR 7.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Cortec Precision sheetmetal has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.8 9 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 10 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 32 1 0
2021 5494.5 3516.5 25 0 0
2020 3.8 2.4 16 0 0
2019 6.7 4.9 14 1 0
2018 32.0 17.3 24 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · CA · San Jose

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,102 employers in San Jose, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DOT Metals 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nelson Steel Products 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CEMCO, LLC - Corporate Office 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stamped Fittings, Inc 7.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Packing Shed 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.A.C. Ag Services, Inc 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vanir Construction Management 380 FTE
STATE-SIZE BENTLEY Mills 380 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA.SAN JOSE 11,308 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Healthcare, Valley Medical Center (Hospital & Clinics) 7,299 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosendin - Main 6,964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (SCVMC & Clinics) 6,576 FTE
NAT-TCR ARO001 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Green Hills Community 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunrise Carpentry Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hancock Lumber Company-Brunswick 7.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE TEAM Industries Bagley 380 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACRT Services 380 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shell Polymers Monaca 380 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Licorice Company - La Porte, IN 380 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.