Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Arizona

Cottonwood Village

Cottonwood, AZ · ~59 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cottonwood Village runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Cottonwood Village: 9.1 TCR = 240% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cottonwood Village safety composite

Cottonwood Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cottonwood Village: 0.0 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 25.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.21× in 2024

Cottonwood Village's TCR rose 5.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 25.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cottonwood, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 240% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #89/173
  • PHOTO Pine Haven Christian…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pine Haven Christian Home - Giddings Campus (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Cottonwood Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cottonwood Village averages 9.1 TCR (240% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cottonwood Village TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=13.8 · 2020=25.9 · 2021=17 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=7 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Cottonwood Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 173 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Arizona.

Cottonwood Village (59 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cottonwood Village
Cottonwood Village (59 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Cottonwood Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 1.9 3 0 0
2023 7.0 7.0 4 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 1 1 0
2021 17.0 17.0 0 9 0
2020 25.9 25.9 0 8 0
2019 13.8 12.1 5 3 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AZ · Cottonwood

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 29 employers in Cottonwood, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pine Haven Christian Home - Giddings Campus 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Eddy Pond West 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cottonwood, Elmcroft of 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Falling Water Retirement Community 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Velocity Builders 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE BFL Construction Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ellison-Mills Contracting LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache Pipelines 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Cottonwood 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1299 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1299 336 FTE
CITY-NEAR SWY-0017-0017-02052 FAC-02052-COTTONWOOD-AZ 142 FTE
NAT-TCR Tram-AK 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Primrose Retirement Community of Kokomo 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sullivan County Memorial Hospital 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR North View Middle School 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE BrandSafway Industries LLC - Husky Refinery 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Facility 545 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Hills 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Pines on Carmel Senior Living 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.