Continuing care retirement communities · Arizona

Emerald Springs Senior Living

Yuma, AZ · ~59 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
24.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerald Springs Senior Living runs at 633% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Emerald Springs Senior Living: 24.1 TCR = 633% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerald Springs Senior Living safety composite

Emerald Springs Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 24.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−29.8

2020→2024

Emerald Springs Senior Living injury rate improved

Emerald Springs Senior Living's TCR fell 29.8 from 42.1 in 2020 to 12.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 42.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=42.1 · 2021=42.6 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=19.4 · 2024=12.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Yuma, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 24.1 · 633% of ind

  • DART 12.3 DART
  • RANK #109/109
  • PHOTO The Foothills at Sim…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Foothills at Simi Valley (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Emerald Springs Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emerald Springs Senior Living averages 24.1 TCR (633% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emerald Springs Senior Living TCR series: 2020=42.1 · 2021=42.6 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=19.4 · 2024=12.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Emerald Springs Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 109 Continuing care retirement com employers in Arizona.

Emerald Springs Senior Living (59 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015202530 Average employees Total Case Rate Emerald Springs Senior Living
Emerald Springs Senior Living (59 employees, TCR 24.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Emerald Springs Senior Living has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.3 12.3 6 0 0
2023 19.4 19.4 10 0 0
2022 3.9 3.9 2 0 0
2021 42.6 31.4 10 9 0
2020 42.1 42.1 1 14 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · AZ · Yuma

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Foothills at Simi Valley 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maplewood at Twinsburg 24.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patriots Glen Assisted Living and Memory Care 23.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheffield Manor 24.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Velocity Builders 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE BFL Construction Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ellison-Mills Contracting LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache Pipelines 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR Siskiyou County Health & Human Services Agency - SSD 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Logistics 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR CW Bell Logistics LLC 24.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6957-TYS 24.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Distribution Centers LLC-15913 Mountain Ave. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAF Atlanta 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE CECO Concrete Construction : Cincinnati 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pleune Construction Division 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.