Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · North Carolina

Courier Express Greensboro, NC

Greensboro, NC · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Courier Express Greensboro, NC runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Courier Express Greensboro, NC: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Courier Express Greensboro, NC safety composite

Courier Express Greensboro, NC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

86/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Courier Express Greensboro, NC held a steady TCR band

Courier Express Greensboro, NC's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/214
  • PHOTO Detroit
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Detroit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Courier Express Greensboro, NC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Courier Express Greensboro, NC averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Courier Express Greensboro, NC TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Courier Express Greensboro, NC falls in its industry

6,679 Express delivery services (exc establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 214 Express delivery services (exc employers in North Carolina.

Courier Express Greensboro, NC (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Courier Express Greensboro, NC
Courier Express Greensboro, NC (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Courier Express Greensboro, NC has fewer employees than the Express delivery services (except establ median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · NC · Greensboro

6,679 Express delivery services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Port Chester 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond East 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE MGF Logistics LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE CVP - TVRH Holly Springs 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Whaley Foodservice-Raleigh 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shamrock Construction & Remediation LLC 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kedplasma - Buffalo 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spelts Schultz Truss 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE USF Manassas VA 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allegheny General Suburban Campus 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.