Continuing care retirement communities · California

Covenant Living at the Samarkand

Santa Barbara, CA · ~259 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Covenant Living at the Samarkand runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Covenant Living at the Samarkand: 6.3 TCR = 164% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Covenant Living at the Samarkand safety composite

Covenant Living at the Samarkand scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2019→2024

Covenant Living at the Samarkand injury rate improved

Covenant Living at the Samarkand's TCR fell 2.2 from 7.7 in 2019 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=7.7 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Santa Barbara, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 164% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #60/216
  • PHOTO Finnish American Vil…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~259 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Finnish American Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Covenant Living at the Samarkand in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Covenant Living at the Samarkand averages 6.3 TCR (164% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Covenant Living at the Samarkand TCR series: 2019=7.7 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=8.1 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Covenant Living at the Samarkand falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 216 Continuing care retirement com employers in California.

Covenant Living at the Samarkand (259 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Covenant Living at the Samarkand
Covenant Living at the Samarkand (259 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Covenant Living at the Samarkand has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 3.9 10 0 0
2023 8.1 7.6 15 0 0
2022 6.7 4.1 13 0 0
2021 5.6 1.5 10 1 0
2020 3.8 1.9 8 0 0
2019 7.7 5.1 14 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Santa Barbara

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 173 employers in Santa Barbara, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Finnish American Village 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cathedral Village 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie Meadows Senior Living 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RIVER WOODS PLACE 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harvest 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Bay Municipal Utility District - Wastewater 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clark Pacific - West Sacramento 259 FTE
STATE-SIZE Raymond-Southern California, Inc. 259 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Santa Barbara 10,779 FTE
CITY-NEAR Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital 3,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Santa Barbara 1,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR Big Green Santa Barbara 674 FTE
NAT-TCR Washburn House 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mount Vernon Presbyterian 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 3607 Kannapolis 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Rotherham Construction Inc 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE O.C. Seacrets, Inc. 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crec Central Office 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Golden Triangle Construction (All Jobs) 259 FTE
NAT-SIZE Georgia System Operations Corporation 259 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.