Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Minnesota

Prairie Meadows Senior Living

Kasson, MN · ~43 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prairie Meadows Senior Living runs at 164% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Prairie Meadows Senior Living: 6.3 TCR = 164% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prairie Meadows Senior Living safety composite

Prairie Meadows Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Prairie Meadows Senior Living held a steady TCR band

Prairie Meadows Senior Living's TCR held near 0.1 from 4.6 in 2018 to 4.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 24.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.6 · 2019=24.6 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Kasson, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 164% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #89/226
  • PHOTO Finnish American Vil…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Finnish American Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Prairie Meadows Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prairie Meadows Senior Living averages 6.3 TCR (164% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prairie Meadows Senior Living TCR series: 2018=4.6 · 2019=24.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Prairie Meadows Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 226 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Prairie Meadows Senior Living (43 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Prairie Meadows Senior Living
Prairie Meadows Senior Living (43 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Prairie Meadows Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 24.6 0.0 5 0 0
2018 4.6 4.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MN · Kasson

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 17 employers in Kasson, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Finnish American Village 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cathedral Village 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covenant Living at the Samarkand 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR RIVER WOODS PLACE 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR K-M Elementary School 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kasson - Main Store 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR K-M High School 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR K-M Middle School 63 FTE
NAT-TCR Hoffman Structures, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2975 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR WinCup Tolleson 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Contech Piamp 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rancho San Miguel - Broadway 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glenwood Place 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCO-E22 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Neumiller Electric, Inc. 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.