Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Oregon

Coyote Springs

Boardman, OR · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coyote Springs runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade C.

Coyote Springs: 1.3 TCR = 109% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coyote Springs safety composite

Coyote Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2024

Coyote Springs injury rate improved

Coyote Springs's TCR fell 0.6 from 3.2 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Boardman, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.3 · 109% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/16
  • PHOTO Sundt Generating Sta…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sundt Generating Station (TPP) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Coyote Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coyote Springs averages 1.3 TCR (109% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coyote Springs TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Coyote Springs falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 16 Electric power generation, fos employers in Oregon.

Coyote Springs (32 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Coyote Springs
Coyote Springs (32 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Coyote Springs has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.0 0 1 0
2023 2.9 0.0 0 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.2 3.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · OR · Boardman

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 32 employers in Boardman, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sundt Generating Station (TPP) 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucla Generating Station 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Myers Plant 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Deer Park Energy Center 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE ASSOCIATED FRUIT CO. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Obersinner Farms, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albany 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blaylock Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR BOARDMAN OR WEST (MAIN) 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR BOARDMAN OR EAST 431 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boardman Foods Incorporated 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR Castle Rock Farming LLC 196 FTE
NAT-TCR MH Charleston 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Super Western Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR SII Lake Charles 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fossett Paving Co., LLC 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE F-S Prestress LLC Hattiesburg 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forbes 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2000 - Environmental Denver CO (inc 2000,2001,2005,2008,2016) 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.