Fisheries, finfish · Washington
C/P Northern Glacier
SEATTLE, WA · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 10.2
- Avg TCR
- 4.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
C/P Northern Glacier runs at 227% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fisheries, finfish workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 10.2
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 4.5
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 22
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares C/P Northern Glacier's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024).
Injury rate over time
C/P Northern Glacier's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 4.5 industry benchmark.
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 114111.
Where C/P Northern Glacier falls in its industry
60 Fisheries, finfish establishmentsSafer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.3.
C/P Northern Glacier has an average TCR of 10.2, which is 227% of the industry average (4.5) for Fisheries, finfish. This is significantly worse than average.
Safety Insights for C/P Northern Glacier
C/P Northern Glacier operates an establishment with approximately 50 full-time equivalent workers in SEATTLE, WA, classified under the Fisheries, finfish industry (NAICS 114111). Across 3 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 22 recordable injuries, 15 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 10.2 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the F letter grade (Failing Safety Record).
Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 4.5 for Fisheries, finfish, C/P Northern Glacier's workforce experiences 227% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked, a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers, so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR above the benchmark flags a higher-than-typical risk profile for jobseekers, insurers, and enforcement agencies to examine.
Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 3 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating C/P Northern Glacier as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries, there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from C/P Northern Glacier's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 114111 - Fisheries, finfish.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2018)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
15 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 259,309 hours worked = 11.57 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| C/P Northern Glacier (this establishment) | 10.22 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Menhaden fishing industry avg | 4.50 | BLS IIF, NAICS 114111 |
| Washington state avg (all industries) | 6.20 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by C/P Northern Glacier to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2018: 16 reportable incidents · 8 injuries, 8 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2017: 13 reportable incidents · 8 injuries, 5 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 8 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 2 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 12.3 | 11.6 | 8 | 8 | 0 |
| 2017 | 11.3 | 11.3 | 8 | 5 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 6 | 2 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on C/P Northern Glacier's reported OSHA injury record versus its Fisheries, finfish peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 227% of the Fisheries, finfish benchmark, C/P Northern Glacier reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Fisheries, finfish sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is C/P Northern Glacier's safety grade?
How is the safety grade calculated?
How many injuries has C/P Northern Glacier reported?
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.