Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services · North Carolina

CPI Security Greensboro Division

Greensboro, NC · ~39 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CPI Security Greensboro Division runs at 184% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services workplace, earning a grade D.

CPI Security Greensboro Division: 4.8 TCR = 184% of Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS 2.6 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CPI Security Greensboro Division safety composite

CPI Security Greensboro Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.6

2016→2018

CPI Security Greensboro Division injury rate improved

CPI Security Greensboro Division's TCR fell 9.6 from 9.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.6 · 2018=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561621 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 184% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/7
  • PHOTO West Langhorne FS (S…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Langhorne FS (SSS, CSS) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

CPI Security Greensboro Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CPI Security Greensboro Division averages 4.8 TCR (184% of the Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CPI Security Greensboro Division TCR series: 2016=9.6 · 2018=0 · BLS 2.6

Where CPI Security Greensboro Division falls in its industry

161 Alarm systems sales combined w establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 7 Alarm systems sales combined w employers in North Carolina.

CPI Security Greensboro Division (39 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CPI Security Greensboro Division
CPI Security Greensboro Division (39 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 1.7

CPI Security Greensboro Division has fewer employees than the Alarm systems sales combined with instal median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 9.6 7.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561621 · NC · Greensboro

161 Alarm systems sales combined with installation, repair, or monitoring services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Langhorne FS (SSS, CSS) 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bellingham Lock and Safe dba Security Solutions 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Alarm Business Office 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nextgen Systems LLC 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Taylor's Nursery-Louisburg 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE B & S Farming, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jeffery C Lee Farms, INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sullivan Farms Inc. 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR SMG - U.S. Bank Stadium 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 0233 - Henrietta, Ny 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR D2 - Wilmington Upholstry 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Aa Admiral Club Jfk B Cc 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Green Lake Tube LLC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russ Darrow LLC 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Textron Specialized Vehicles - Premier De-icers 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE HBSHSEMD26 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.