Landscape care and maintenance services · Massachusetts

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management

Danvers, MA · ~77 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management: 6.0 TCR = 134% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management safety composite

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2023→2024

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management injury rate improved

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management's TCR fell 7.2 from 9.6 in 2023 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=9.6 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Danvers, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 134% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #30/58
  • PHOTO Live Art Plantscapes…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Live Art Plantscapes, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management averages 6.0 TCR (134% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management TCR series: 2023=9.6 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 58 Landscape care and maintenance employers in Massachusetts.

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management (77 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management
Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management (77 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Crandall & Company, d/b/a JC Grounds Management has more employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2023 9.6 1.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · MA · Danvers

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 119 employers in Danvers, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Live Art Plantscapes, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlanta South 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Maintenance Department 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goldenstate Landscapes Inc. 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Richmond Group Main Office 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chapman Construction/Design 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE G.V.W., Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5001 - Avon, MA 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abiomed, Inc. (Danvers HQ) 1,915 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Arc 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic-CVG 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Millipore Sigma 17 Cherry Hill Drive Danvers 943 FTE
NAT-TCR TN Warehouse 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR J & S Manufacturing Co., Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin'S Food Markets 6078 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 353 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pratt (Bell Packaging), Inc. 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Hills Village Senior Residence 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Verdin Company 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chefs Warehouse West Coast LLC- Portland 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.