Lawn maintenance services · Arizona

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC

Tempe, AZ · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Lawn maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC: 5.6 TCR = 124% of Lawn maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC safety composite

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC: 0.0 → 11.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 11.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2022

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC's TCR rose 11.8 from 0.0 in 2017 to 11.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Tempe, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 124% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #33/55
  • PHOTO GroundsPro Indy
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GroundsPro Indy (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC averages 5.6 TCR (124% of the Lawn maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=8 · 2021=8 · 2022=11.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC falls in its industry

2,875 Lawn maintenance services establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 55 Lawn maintenance services employers in Arizona.

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC (28 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC
Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC (28 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Creative Environments Maintenance Services, LLC has fewer employees than the Lawn maintenance services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.8 3.9 3 0 0
2021 8.0 4.0 2 0 0
2020 8.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · AZ · Tempe

2,875 Lawn maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 569 employers in Tempe, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GroundsPro Indy 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seattle North 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Complete Landsculpture of Texas Oklahoma office 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Earth Images, Inc. - Greenwood 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABACA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tatum 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tonopah 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cholla Livestock 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR SALT RIVER PROJECT DISTRICT VALLEY 4,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR 202376 4,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Plants and Offices 4,518 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Communications, LLC 3,432 FTE
NAT-TCR Thomas Foods International USA 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Super Stop & Shop 2815 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100574 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alpha Dyno Nobel - Lincoln, CA 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bierlein Trombley Electric 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Joyner Masonry Works, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond Machine Company, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard by Marriott University of Dayton 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.