Land preparation machinery, construction, manufacturing · Minnesota

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1

Rochester, MN · ~79 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 runs at 268% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Land preparation machinery, construction, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1: 8.9 TCR = 268% of Land preparation machinery, construction, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 safety composite

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1: 8.0 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 10.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2024

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1's TCR rose 0.4 from 8.0 in 2021 to 8.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · Rochester, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 268% of ind

  • DART 8.4 DART
  • RANK #12/21
  • PHOTO Concord Road Equipme…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Concord Road Equipment Mfg. Inc. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 averages 8.9 TCR (268% of the Land preparation machinery, construction, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 TCR series: 2021=8 · 2022=8.9 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 falls in its industry

400 Land preparation machinery, co establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 21 Land preparation machinery, co employers in Minnesota.

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 (79 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1
Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 (79 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Crenlo Engineered Cabs - Plant 1 has fewer employees than the Land preparation machinery, construction median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 8.4 3 0 0
2023 10.2 0.0 2 2 0
2022 8.9 3.0 2 4 0
2021 8.0 0.9 4 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · MN · Rochester

400 Land preparation machinery, construction, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 290 employers in Rochester, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Concord Road Equipment Mfg. Inc. 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR REICHDRILL LLC 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pierce Pacific Manufacturing 8.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR E-Z Drill, Inc 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elcor Construction 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALLSTATES PAVEMENT RECYCLING & STABILIZATION, INC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sir Lines A-Lot 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE USI (Hastings, MN) 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Rochester 38,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olmsted County 1,304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 823 FTE
NAT-TCR St Louis MO 064 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lentex Corporation 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Avamere at Bethany 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Westgate Assisted Living 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bishop, Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burkholder's Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZZ Galvanizing - Chattanooga LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADI Construction of Virginia LLC 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.