Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Crimson Ridge Meadows

Name: Crimson Ridge Meadows Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Rochester, NY · ~43 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 13.8
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crimson Ridge Meadows runs at 364% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Crimson Ridge Meadows: 13.8 TCR = 364% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crimson Ridge Meadows safety composite

Crimson Ridge Meadows scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 13.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.2

2022→2023

Crimson Ridge Meadows injury rate improved

Crimson Ridge Meadows's TCR fell 20.2 from 23.9 in 2022 to 3.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=23.9 · 2023=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rochester, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.8 · 364% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #257/283
PHOTO Isle at Cedar Ridge
BOOK 2y book
INJ 6 inj
SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Isle at Cedar Ridge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

This site

13.8
Isle at Cedar

13.8
Sonata Winderm

13.8
Rittenhouse Se

13.8
Regency Palms

13.8

What this shows Crimson Ridge Meadows averages 13.8 TCR (364% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Crimson Ridge Meadows TCR series: 2022=23.9 · 2023=3.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Crimson Ridge Meadows falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #257 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Crimson Ridge Meadows (43 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Crimson Ridge Meadows has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2023	3.8	0.0	1	0	0
2022	23.9	0.0	5	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Rochester

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Isle at Cedar Ridge	CEDAR PARK, TX	13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Sonata Windermere	WINDERMERE, FL	13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso	VAALPARAISO, IN	13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Regency Palms Oxnard	OXNARD, CA	13.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Phillips Family Farm, Inc.	NORTH COLLINS	43 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Aurora Ridge Dairy, LLC	AURORA	43 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Allenwaite Farms, Inc.	SCHAGHTICOKE	43 FTE
STATE-SIZE	NYSEG 3 City Center	ROCHESTER	43 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Division 50 University of Rochester	Rochester	13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Rochester General Hospital	Rochester	7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Division 40 University of Rochester	Rochester	4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Unity Hospital	Rochester	3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR	American Red Cross - 113 W Park Dr	Birmingham, AL	13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Lemon Grove, Ca #00515	Lemon Grove, CA	13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Colonial Engineering Inc.	Portage, MI	13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Jack in the Box #3430	San Jose, CA	13.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	IQHC Fairmont MN	Fairmont, MN	43 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Trucking	Jeffersonville, IN	43 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Life Flight 1 - Danville	Danville, PA	43 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Snohomish	Snohomish, WA	43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.