Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Texas

Isle at Cedar Ridge

Cedar Park, TX · ~61 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Isle at Cedar Ridge runs at 364% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Isle at Cedar Ridge: 13.8 TCR = 364% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Isle at Cedar Ridge safety composite

Isle at Cedar Ridge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.6

2017→2024

Isle at Cedar Ridge injury rate improved

Isle at Cedar Ridge's TCR fell 11.6 from 19.6 in 2017 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 25.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=19.6 · 2018=13.0 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=14.8 · 2021=25.2 · 2022=14.6 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Cedar Park, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.8 · 364% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #423/470
  • PHOTO Sonata Windermere
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sonata Windermere (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Isle at Cedar Ridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Isle at Cedar Ridge averages 13.8 TCR (364% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Isle at Cedar Ridge TCR series: 2017=19.6 · 2018=13 · 2019=13.1 · 2020=14.8 · 2021=25.2 · 2022=14.6 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=8 · BLS 3.8

Where Isle at Cedar Ridge falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #423 safest of 470 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Isle at Cedar Ridge (61 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Isle at Cedar Ridge
Isle at Cedar Ridge (61 employees, TCR 13.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Isle at Cedar Ridge has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 4.0 4 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 14.6 14.6 6 0 0
2021 25.2 25.2 5 0 0
2020 14.8 5.0 6 0 0
2019 13.1 7.9 5 0 0
2018 13.0 11.2 7 0 0
2017 19.6 14.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · TX · Cedar Park

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 94 employers in Cedar Park, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sonata Windermere 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crimson Ridge Meadows 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rittenhouse Senior Living at Valparaiso 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Palms Oxnard 13.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Muleshoe Dairy LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patriot Drilling LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXOMA SVC CTR 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE PEC-Cedar Park 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedar Park Regional Medical Center 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2991 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2991 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2342 - Cedar Park 306 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0675 Bloomfield Hills 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Village at Woods Edge 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Galaxy 1 Marketing, Inc. - Quad Cities 13.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Express Ruskin 13.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE TLS Tulsa 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corner Stone Construction 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Police Station 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Courtyard Manor Nurse Care Center 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.