Ferrous forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Texas

Crosby - Longview

Longview, TX · ~383 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crosby - Longview runs at 109% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Ferrous forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade C.

Crosby - Longview: 3.6 TCR = 109% of Ferrous forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crosby - Longview safety composite

Crosby - Longview scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2018→2024

Crosby - Longview injury rate improved

Crosby - Longview's TCR fell 2.9 from 6.3 in 2018 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Longview, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 109% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #15/27
  • PHOTO Industrial Manufactu…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 96 inj
  • SIZE ~383 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Industrial Manufacturing Forging (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Crosby - Longview in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crosby - Longview averages 3.6 TCR (109% of the Ferrous forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crosby - Longview TCR series: 2018=6.3 · 2019=3.5 · 2020=4.4 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=2 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Crosby - Longview falls in its industry

241 Ferrous forgings made from pur establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 27 Ferrous forgings made from pur employers in Texas.

Crosby - Longview (383 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Crosby - Longview
Crosby - Longview (383 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Crosby - Longview has more employees than the Ferrous forgings made from purchased iro median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.4 2.1 15 0 0
2023 2.0 1.5 9 0 0
2022 2.3 1.9 10 0 0
2021 3.2 2.7 13 0 0
2020 4.4 3.8 14 0 0
2019 3.5 3.2 13 1 0
2018 6.3 1.3 22 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · TX · Longview

241 Ferrous forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 259 employers in Longview, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Industrial Manufacturing Forging 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trinity Forge, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portland Forge - Portland, IN 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR McInnes Rolled Rings 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Odessa TX East 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE DynaTen 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE DPT Laboratories, LTD (Main Plant and Science Building) 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3888 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longview - GSMC 155 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Shepherd Medical Center - Longview 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company 1,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Operations 1,500 FTE
NAT-TCR 1205 LKQ PYP Erdman 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Michigan Brand, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Peabody Health & Rehab 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Department of Human Services 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE FFF Enterprises, Inc 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE Henderson Ice Cream Plant 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE County of Santa Clara Health System, Valley Health Plan (725) 383 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.