Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished · Indiana

Portland Forge - Portland, IN

Portland, IN · ~146 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Portland Forge - Portland, IN runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished workplace, earning a grade C.

Portland Forge - Portland, IN: 3.5 TCR = 106% of Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Portland Forge - Portland, IN safety composite

Portland Forge - Portland, IN scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2021→2024

Portland Forge - Portland, IN injury rate improved

Portland Forge - Portland, IN's TCR fell 7.4 from 7.4 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=7.4 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332111 · Portland, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 106% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO McInnes Rolled Rings
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~146 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McInnes Rolled Rings (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Portland Forge - Portland, IN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Portland Forge - Portland, IN averages 3.5 TCR (106% of the Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Portland Forge - Portland, IN TCR series: 2021=7.4 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Portland Forge - Portland, IN falls in its industry

241 Forgings made from purchased i establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Forgings made from purchased i employers in Indiana.

Portland Forge - Portland, IN (146 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Portland Forge - Portland, IN
Portland Forge - Portland, IN (146 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Portland Forge - Portland, IN has more employees than the Forgings made from purchased iron or ste median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.2 1.1 6 0 0
2022 3.3 0.7 5 0 0
2021 7.4 4.9 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332111 · IN · Portland

241 Forgings made from purchased iron or steel, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 23 employers in Portland, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McInnes Rolled Rings 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meritor Heavy Vehicle Systems LLC 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Industrial Manufacturing Forging 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ellwood Closed Die Group 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Royalty Companies of Indiana Inc. 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry Evansville 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Decatur Plastic Products Inc - Indiana Molding Division 146 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rolls Royce: Performance 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mexican Original Portland Plnt 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2388 251 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2388 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR ATI Forged Products 166 FTE
NAT-TCR Federated Co-ops, Inc. - St Cloud Cenex 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Wave Division Holdings, LLC-Port Orchard 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Polo Grounds Towers 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Palfinger US, American Roll Off 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Chippewa Middle School 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guthrie County Hospital 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seacrest Operator 146 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith + Nephew Inc. GDC Memphis, TN 146 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.