Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Mississippi

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant

Batesville, MS · ~177 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant: 2.3 TCR = 69% of Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant safety composite

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2016→2024

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant injury rate improved

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Batesville, MS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P53
  • PHOTO Molson Coors - RMMC …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~177 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Molson Coors - RMMC End Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant averages 2.3 TCR (69% of the Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=4.3 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant falls in its industry

217 Metal cans, light gauge metal, establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant (177 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant
Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant (177 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Batesville Plant has more employees than the Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.8 0.0 2 0 0
2022 3.8 1.7 10 1 0
2021 2.9 1.1 8 0 0
2020 1.5 0.0 4 0 0
2019 2.4 1.2 6 0 0
2018 2.9 0.9 6 0 0
2017 4.3 2.7 8 0 0
2016 1.8 1.4 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · MS · Batesville

217 Metal cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 38 employers in Batesville, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Molson Coors - RMMC End Plant 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Lawrence Plant 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vobev 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Mill Park Plant 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brooksville Further processing 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE 70323 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Looks Great Services of Mississippi Inc. 177 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tishomingo Health Services 177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenwood-Batesville 439 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Batesville, MS 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Batesville MS 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1468 265 FTE
NAT-TCR B G Brecke Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Synergy Flavors, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EP Scientific Products, LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Madeira Beach Courtyard 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4Front Engineered Solutions- Muskego 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Thomas J. Dyer Company 177 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enterprise UTM 177 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.