Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance · Texas

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview

Longview, TX · ~43 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance workplace, earning a grade A.

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview: 1.7 TCR = 38% of Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview safety composite

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 53%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2020→2024

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview injury rate improved

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview's TCR fell 4.5 from 6.5 in 2020 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Longview, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 38% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #39/137
  • PHOTO T160
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: T160 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview averages 1.7 TCR (38% of the Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview TCR series: 2020=6.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview falls in its industry

1,026 Bulk liquids trucking, long-di establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 137 Bulk liquids trucking, long-di employers in Texas.

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview (43 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview
Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview (43 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Cryogenic Transportation 64013 Longview has fewer employees than the Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 6.5 6.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · TX · Longview

1,026 Bulk liquids trucking, long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 259 employers in Longview, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR T160 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landes Trucking 72003 Hope Hull 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Troy Terminal 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR D & M Carriers LLC 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timpson Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midkiff Farmers Coop 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seagraves GP Shelling Plant 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Paso Golden Peanut Treenut Pecan Shelling 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Longview - GSMC 155 2,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Shepherd Medical Center - Longview 1,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastman Chemical Company 1,535 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Operations 1,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Western Fire Protection, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jm Eagle 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 530-NiSource-Goshen IN-Operating HQ 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SupplyOne New York 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodbury Supply Company Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE DNS Contracting LLC 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vcf 059 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 004-EUNICE 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.