Aircraft engine overhauling · Ohio

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division

Cincinnati, OH · ~39 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft engine overhauling workplace, earning a grade C.

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division: 2.8 TCR = 84% of Aircraft engine overhauling BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division safety composite

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division: 0.0 → 1.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2024

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division's TCR rose 1.9 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 84% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #42/46
  • PHOTO THERM, INC.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: THERM, INC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division averages 2.8 TCR (84% of the Aircraft engine overhauling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=3 · 2023=2 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine overhauling establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 46 Aircraft engine overhauling employers in Ohio.

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division (39 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division
CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division (39 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

CTL Aerospace Repair and Overhaul Division has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine overhauling median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2023 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2022 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2019 6.3 6.3 2 1 0
2018 4.3 4.3 0 2 0
2017 4.9 4.9 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · OH · Cincinnati

366 Aircraft engine overhauling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR THERM, INC. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Rutland, VT 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barnes Aerospace Lansing Division 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Car-Graph Inc 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DRW PACKING INC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE OHI Greenhouse LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridgewater Dairy LLC 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rossburg Facility 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Hebron 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Machine Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Mountain Crest Hospital 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Booth Hill School 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Park #123 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diamond Manufacturing Company IN 351 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Loftech 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doherty, Giannini, Reitz Construction 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.