Inductors, electronic component-type (e.g., chokes, coils, transformers), manufacturing · Arizona

CTM Magnetics Inc.

Tempe, AZ · ~113 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CTM Magnetics Inc. runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Inductors, electronic component-type (e.g., chokes, coils, transformers), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

CTM Magnetics Inc.: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Inductors, electronic component-type (e.g., chokes, coils, transformers), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CTM Magnetics Inc. safety composite

CTM Magnetics Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2018→2024

CTM Magnetics Inc. injury rate improved

CTM Magnetics Inc.'s TCR fell 2.9 from 2.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.9 · 2019=2.0 · 2022=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334416 · Tempe, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Ronken Industries Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ronken Industries Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

CTM Magnetics Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CTM Magnetics Inc. averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Inductors, electronic component-type (e.g., chokes, coils, transformers), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CTM Magnetics Inc. TCR series: 2018=2.9 · 2019=2 · 2022=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where CTM Magnetics Inc. falls in its industry

134 Inductors, electronic componen establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Inductors, electronic componen employers in Arizona.

CTM Magnetics Inc. (113 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CTM Magnetics Inc.
CTM Magnetics Inc. (113 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.1

CTM Magnetics Inc. has more employees than the Inductors, electronic component-type (e. median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.2 0.0 4 0 0
2019 2.0 0.0 2 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 0 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334416 · AZ · Tempe

134 Inductors, electronic component-type (e.g., chokes, coils, transformers), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 569 employers in Tempe, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ronken Industries Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Magnetics Division of Spang & Company - Phoenix West 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kyocera AVX Components Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR STK Electronics, Inc. DBA Pelco Component Technologies 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Paradise Valley 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tohono Oddham Utility Authority 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mesa Greenfield Water Treatment Plant 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Powerline LLC - National Powerline 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR SALT RIVER PROJECT DISTRICT VALLEY 4,655 FTE
CITY-NEAR 202376 4,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Plants and Offices 4,518 FTE
CITY-NEAR IES Communications, LLC 3,432 FTE
NAT-TCR HSHS Good Shepherd Hospital 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fairview Nursing Care Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR American House - Southgate 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ACME Industrial Piping, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raley's 108- Reno 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE 19826 Russell Rd South Kent WA 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Garland, Tx 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Premier Metal Buyers 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.