Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing · South Carolina

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation

Myrtle Beach, SC · ~181 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation safety composite

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation: 1.6 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.9× in 2024

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation's TCR rose 0.8 from 1.6 in 2023 to 2.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334416 · Myrtle Beach, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Magnetics Division o…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~181 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magnetics Division of Spang & Company - Phoenix West (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kyocera AVX Components Corporation averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation TCR series: 2023=1.6 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Kyocera AVX Components Corporation falls in its industry

134 Capacitors, electronic, fixed establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Capacitors, electronic, fixed employers in South Carolina.

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation (181 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kyocera AVX Components Corporation
Kyocera AVX Components Corporation (181 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Kyocera AVX Components Corporation has more employees than the Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variab median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 1.8 4 0 0
2023 1.6 1.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334416 · SC · Myrtle Beach

134 Capacitors, electronic, fixed and variable, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 244 employers in Myrtle Beach, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magnetics Division of Spang & Company - Phoenix West 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTM Magnetics Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR STK Electronics, Inc. DBA Pelco Component Technologies 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ronken Industries Inc. 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Owens Corning - Aiken 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hitachi Rail STS Batesburg, SC 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPS Packaging 181 FTE
STATE-SIZE 425 Columbia 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA - Grand Strand Medical Center 1,584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Grand Strand Health 1,257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Founders National Golf, LLC 829 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocean Lakes Service Corp. 440 FTE
NAT-TCR Cook Inlet Tribal Council 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sterling Engineering 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Lumber 242 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kight Home Center 492 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Casar - Santa Rosa Center 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altus - Tuscaloosa 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Electralloy 181 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chatsworth Park Health Care Center 181 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.