Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Texas

Cullum Construction Co.

Dallas, TX · ~54 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cullum Construction Co. runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

Cullum Construction Co.: 1.6 TCR = 56% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cullum Construction Co. safety composite

Cullum Construction Co. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cullum Construction Co.: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.82× in 2024

Cullum Construction Co.'s TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.82× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #77/194
  • PHOTO Collins Contracting …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Collins Contracting Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Cullum Construction Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cullum Construction Co. averages 1.6 TCR (56% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cullum Construction Co. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=1.6 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Cullum Construction Co. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #77 safest of 194 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Texas.

Cullum Construction Co. (54 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cullum Construction Co.
Cullum Construction Co. (54 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Cullum Construction Co. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 2 0 0
2019 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · TX · Dallas

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Collins Contracting Co., Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oscar Renda Contracting Inc.-Biloxi 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rack & Ballauer excavating inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Randall County Feedyard 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1681 CORPORATE DR MCKINNEY TX 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3525 N HWY 77 WAXAHACHIE TX 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clearwater Resources LLC 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Springdale 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Stilwell Public Schools 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Department 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Sarasota Midtown 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 019/University of the Cumberlands 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perfect Shutters, Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE F.H. Peterson Machine Corp. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Neal Blaisdell Waikiki Shell 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.