Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Maryland

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc.

Baltimore, MD · ~54 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. runs at 56% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 56% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. safety composite

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2022→2024

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. injury rate improved

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc.'s TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.4 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 56% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/34
  • PHOTO Collins Contracting …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Collins Contracting Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (56% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. TCR series: 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 34 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Maryland.

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. (54 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc.
R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. (54 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

R E Harrington Plumbing & Heating Co. Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 0.0 1 0 1
2022 2.4 2.4 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · MD · Baltimore

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Collins Contracting Co., Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cullum Construction Co. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oscar Renda Contracting Inc.-Biloxi 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rack & Ballauer excavating inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6728-00030023-25 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conowingo 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE FiberPlus, Inc. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blastech Enterprises, Inc. 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Mannington Mills, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 4660 - Durham 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 3407 - Moscow West Pullman Road 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bullseye Leak Detection, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alliance Industrial Group, Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheds Unlimited 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE 14-OH 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Young Engineers 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.