Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing · Texas

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas

San Antonio, TX · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas runs at 244% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas: 13.2 TCR = 244% of Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas safety composite

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2019

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas injury rate improved

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas's TCR fell 0.4 from 10.4 in 2016 to 10.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 19.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.4 · 2018=19.1 · 2019=10.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336310 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 244% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #9/10
  • PHOTO Sata USA INC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sata USA INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas averages 13.2 TCR (244% of the Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2018=19.1 · 2019=10.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas falls in its industry

221 Engines and parts (except dies establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 10 Engines and parts (except dies employers in Texas.

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas (42 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas
Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas (42 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 165 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas has fewer employees than the Engines and parts (except diesel), autom median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 10.1 8.1 5 0 0
2018 19.1 17.3 11 0 0
2016 10.4 10.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336310 · TX · San Antonio

221 Engines and parts (except diesel), automotive and truck, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sata USA INC 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Yutaka Corporation 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delano 13.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bryant Racing Inc 12.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Headquarters Southeast 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Littlefield Feedyard 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXAS BEEF PRODUCERS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 3-H Dairy LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Duty Free Americas, Inc. - Miami International Airport 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Symphony of Crestwood 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Public Works 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fairfield Ca (Watney Way) Depot 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covanta Marion, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Covanta Harrisburg, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE construction 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.