Building Cleaning/Maintenance · California

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp

Indio, CA · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp runs at 293% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building Cleaning/Maintenance workplace, earning a grade F.

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp: 13.2 TCR = 293% of Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp safety composite

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp: 4.8 → 19.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 19.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.37× in 2019

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp's TCR rose 14.8 from 4.8 in 2017 to 19.6 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Indio, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 293% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #345/368
  • PHOTO PSSI - 0684 Eagle Fo…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PSSI - 0684 Eagle Foods (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp averages 13.2 TCR (293% of the Building Cleaning/Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp TCR series: 2017=4.8 · 2018=15.1 · 2019=19.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp falls in its industry

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #345 safest of 368 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers in California.

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp (42 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp
Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp (42 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Sodexo at Tenet John F Kennedy Mem Hosp has fewer employees than the Building Cleaning/Maintenance median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 19.6 4.9 4 0 0
2018 15.1 0.0 4 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · CA · Indio

4,064 Building Cleaning/Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 85 employers in Indio, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PSSI - 0684 Eagle Foods 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Red Bank 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT SAH FLOAT POOL 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR B050 Orlando Fashion Square 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Quad H 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE CJJ Farming, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceano Packing Company LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Connell Ranch 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 591 1,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fantasy Springs Resort and Casino 1,269 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fantasy Springs Resort Casino 1,136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ono-067 917 FTE
NAT-TCR Duty Free Americas, Inc. - Miami International Airport 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Curtis-Maruyasu America, Inc.-Texas 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PAM Specialty Hospital of Victoria South 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Symphony of Crestwood 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Tenet Rehab Institute Mi Evs 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Paul Smith'S College 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Jefferson District 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaHarpe Davier 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.