Steam turbines manufacturing · South Carolina

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions

Summerville, SC · ~85 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Steam turbines manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Steam turbines manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions safety composite

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2020→2022

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions injury rate improved

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.8 in 2020 to 1.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.8 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=1.8 · 2022=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333611 · Summerville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO On-Shore Wind : Pens…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: On-Shore Wind : Pensacola, FL, USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Steam turbines manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions TCR series: 2020=1.8 · 2022=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions falls in its industry

97 Steam turbines manufacturing establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Steam turbines manufacturing employers in South Carolina.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions (85 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions
Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions (85 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 141 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Curtiss-Wright Corporation - Steam & Air Solutions has fewer employees than the Steam turbines manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.0 0.0 0 1 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333611 · SC · Summerville

97 Steam turbines manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 188 employers in Summerville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR On-Shore Wind : Pensacola, FL, USA 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siemens Energy Inc. Winston Service Center 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Siemens Energy 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCC Airfoils LLC- Painesville (RP) Plant 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pee Dee Electric 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trident Construction, LLC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charleston, SC HVAC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Paragon Site Work Constructors 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thorne research - Omni one 478 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scout Boats, Inc 436 FTE
CITY-NEAR Summerville Medical Center 426 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1037 420 FTE
NAT-TCR Best Line Equipment - Uniontown 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillsboro Spectra Facilities and Onsites 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Revak Keene Turbomachinery 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rogers Mechanical Contractors, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zeigler Gurnee 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland Utilities - Water/Wastewater Division 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Carmel-by-the-Sea 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Mill of Bel Air 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.