Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Texas

Revak Keene Turbomachinery

La Porte, TX · ~101 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Revak Keene Turbomachinery runs at 67% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade B.

Revak Keene Turbomachinery: 1.4 TCR = 67% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Revak Keene Turbomachinery safety composite

Revak Keene Turbomachinery scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.4 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Revak Keene Turbomachinery: 0.0 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2022

Revak Keene Turbomachinery's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 2.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · La Porte, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 67% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #86/292
  • PHOTO SD Myers LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SD Myers LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Revak Keene Turbomachinery in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Revak Keene Turbomachinery averages 1.4 TCR (67% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Revak Keene Turbomachinery TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.5 · BLS 2.1

Where Revak Keene Turbomachinery falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 292 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Texas.

Revak Keene Turbomachinery (101 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Revak Keene Turbomachinery
Revak Keene Turbomachinery (101 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Revak Keene Turbomachinery has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.5 1.2 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TX · La Porte

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 170 employers in La Porte, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SD Myers LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pengate Handling Systems Inc - York 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pantropic Power Inc - FTL 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Renew Valve & Machine 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hiland Dairy Foods Houston- Air Center 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farwell 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brownfield 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE Memorial 6 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold, Ltd. 2,821 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stronghold Specialty, Ltd. 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR TURN 2 Specialty Companies 1,384 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dashiell Corp/Dacon Corp 973 FTE
NAT-TCR Best Line Equipment - Uniontown 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillsboro Spectra Facilities and Onsites 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1394 - Bardstown Road 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 1111 - Derby 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lake Rudolph Campground & Rv Resort 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE M & R Company 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jordison Construction, Inc 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kerry Norwich 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.