Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture · Wisconsin

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC

Elkhorn, WI · ~44 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade A.

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC: 1.4 TCR = 41% of Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC safety composite

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2020→2024

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC injury rate improved

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC's TCR fell 0.7 from 3.0 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=3.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336111 · Elkhorn, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Hitachi Astemo Rock …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hitachi Astemo Rock Spring (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Custom Service Manufacturing LLC averages 1.4 TCR (41% of the Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC TCR series: 2020=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Custom Service Manufacturing LLC falls in its industry

158 Automobiles assembling on chas establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Automobiles assembling on chas employers in Wisconsin.

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC (44 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Custom Service Manufacturing LLC
Custom Service Manufacturing LLC (44 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 366 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Custom Service Manufacturing LLC has fewer employees than the Automobiles assembling on chassis of own median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336111 · WI · Elkhorn

158 Automobiles assembling on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 47 employers in Elkhorn, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hitachi Astemo Rock Spring 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Detroit Assembly Complex Mack 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Android Industries - Lansing Delta Twp. 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crave Brothers Farm 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Holsum Elm Dairy 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milwaukee South Shore 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARC Contracting of Wisconsin Inc 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhorn Area School District 700 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Lakeland Medical Center 505 FTE
CITY-NEAR US Packaging LLC 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhorn Campus 151 FTE
NAT-TCR Argo 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Infrastucture LBJ East 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Schiele Graphics, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 565-NiSource-Monaca PA 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Point Pleasant Retirement Community 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Proteus, Inc. Porterville Service Center 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cks 350 Pet 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Center District Maintenance 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.