Building, apartment, rental or leasing · Pennsylvania

Point Pleasant Retirement Community

North Versailles, PA · ~44 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Point Pleasant Retirement Community runs at 640% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building, apartment, rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade F.

Point Pleasant Retirement Community: 9.0 TCR = 640% of Building, apartment, rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Point Pleasant Retirement Community safety composite

Point Pleasant Retirement Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.3

2020→2024

Point Pleasant Retirement Community injury rate improved

Point Pleasant Retirement Community's TCR fell 4.3 from 11.5 in 2020 to 7.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=11.5 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=7.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · North Versailles, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 640% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #16/24
  • PHOTO Investment Concepts …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Investment Concepts Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Point Pleasant Retirement Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Point Pleasant Retirement Community averages 9.0 TCR (640% of the Building, apartment, rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Point Pleasant Retirement Community TCR series: 2020=11.5 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=7.2 · BLS 1.4

Where Point Pleasant Retirement Community falls in its industry

1,100 Building, apartment, rental or establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 24 Building, apartment, rental or employers in Pennsylvania.

Point Pleasant Retirement Community (44 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Point Pleasant Retirement Community
Point Pleasant Retirement Community (44 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Point Pleasant Retirement Community has more employees than the Building, apartment, rental or leasing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2023 9.7 0.0 2 0 0
2022 7.4 7.4 2 0 0
2020 11.5 11.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · PA · North Versailles

1,100 Building, apartment, rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 18 employers in North Versailles, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Investment Concepts Inc 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Terrace at Hamilton Mill IL 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lobos Management 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brunswick Associates of Albany, LP Managed by Tri City Rentals LLC 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Milton Grove Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Donegal Egg 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE WESSC West Shore Service Center 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUNSC Sunbury Service Center 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2588 422 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2588 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DAE7 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR PAN 135 FTE
NAT-TCR Ottawa County - Parks Operation Center 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chris Francis Tree Care 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Corn Pro, Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Avports 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Custom Service Manufacturing LLC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Proteus, Inc. Porterville Service Center 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cks 350 Pet 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Center District Maintenance 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.