Centralized administrative offices · Michigan

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM)

Auburn Hills, MI · ~198 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Centralized administrative offices workplace, earning a grade A.

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM): 0.2 TCR = 33% of Centralized administrative offices BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) safety composite

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM): 0.0 → 0.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 0.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM)'s TCR rose 0.5 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/59
  • PHOTO Doe and Ingalls Mana…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~198 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) averages 0.2 TCR (33% of the Centralized administrative offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=0.5 · BLS 0.7

Where Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) falls in its industry

1,475 Centralized administrative off establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 59 Centralized administrative off employers in Michigan.

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) (198 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM)
Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) (198 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Customer Technical Center Michigan (CTCM) has more employees than the Centralized administrative offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · MI · Auburn Hills

1,475 Centralized administrative offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masonite Tampa Corporate Office 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Grove HQ 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Keene - Corporate Dr 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Glastender, Inc. 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mersen USA GS Corp - Bay City 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harold Zeigler Kalamazoo 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE JACKSON MI - 3161 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR TKC Corporate 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6016-A0013_GLBU-MNX08X01 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR West Press 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson Hunt International, Ltd / DBA Champro Sports 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE 9123-Phl-Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc. 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tom Drexler Plumbing, Air & Electric 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Calan - Lancaster Center 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0032-0032-03405 198 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.