Subsidiary management offices · North Carolina

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC

Durham, NC · ~65 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Subsidiary management offices workplace, earning a grade A.

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC: 0.2 TCR = 33% of Subsidiary management offices BLS 0.7 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC safety composite

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.9

2017→2024

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC injury rate improved

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC's TCR fell 1.9 from 1.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.9 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Durham, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/70
  • PHOTO Masonite Tampa Corpo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Masonite Tampa Corporate Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC averages 0.2 TCR (33% of the Subsidiary management offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC TCR series: 2017=1.9 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.7

Where Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC falls in its industry

1,475 Subsidiary management offices establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 70 Subsidiary management offices employers in North Carolina.

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC (65 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC
Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC (65 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Doe and Ingalls Management, LLC has fewer employees than the Subsidiary management offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · NC · Durham

1,475 Subsidiary management offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Masonite Tampa Corporate Office 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Grove HQ 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CS Wholesale Grocers : Keene - Corporate Dr 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 111 Arizona Corporate 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE AgMart Produce, Inc. LELAND, NC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Kinston Hatchery 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayo Fossil Plant 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newell Operations Center 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR BCBSNC Telecommuters 3,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
NAT-TCR Regional Office of Education 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillsdale Construction & Excavating Company 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pittsburgh 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Boston 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Neo Products Corporation Manufacturing Group 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercer Residential Services, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE L.C. Electric, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Associated Equipment Corporation 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.