Skilled nursing facilities · North Carolina

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center

Wilmington, NC · ~92 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center: 6.2 TCR = 96% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center: 2.7 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 24.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.38× in 2024

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 0.9 from 2.7 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 24.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Wilmington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #247/510
  • PHOTO Blueberry Hill Opera…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blueberry Hill Operator. LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center averages 6.2 TCR (96% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2018=6.4 · 2019=9.1 · 2020=24.9 · 2021=3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 6.5

Where Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #247 safest of 510 Skilled nursing facilities employers in North Carolina.

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center (92 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center
Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center (92 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 2.4 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.0 1.5 1 1 0
2020 24.9 24.9 3 15 0
2019 9.1 5.2 5 2 0
2018 6.4 2.6 3 2 0
2016 2.7 2.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Wilmington

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 360 employers in Wilmington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blueberry Hill Operator. LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin Blvd Nursing Home, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Agnesian St. Francis Home 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgewood Post Acute LLC 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aqua North Carolina, Inc. - Cary 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Balfour Beatty - Havelock Bypass 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conover 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eldeco Inc Charlotte 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center 6,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover Regional Medical Center 4,768 FTE
CITY-NEAR GE Hitachi Nuclear Americas 1,975 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Hanover County Government 1,974 FTE
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #87 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Office 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Roofing Plant 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR OEL Construction Services Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kenyon Plastering of Nevada, Inc. 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE New-Com, Inc. 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE SA Recycling Phoenix, 35th Ave. 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mattax Neu Prater 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.