Reinforcing steel contractors · Texas

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office

Houston, TX · ~410 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Reinforcing steel contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office: 1.4 TCR = 50% of Reinforcing steel contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office safety composite

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2019→2024

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office injury rate improved

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.0 in 2019 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.0 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.4 · 50% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #16/66
  • PHOTO Westco Iron Works
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~410 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westco Iron Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office averages 1.4 TCR (50% of the Reinforcing steel contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office TCR series: 2019=3 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=2 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office falls in its industry

705 Reinforcing steel contractors establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 66 Reinforcing steel contractors employers in Texas.

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office (410 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office
D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office (410 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

D'Ambra Construction Corporate Office has more employees than the Reinforcing steel contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 1.4 4 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2022 1.3 0.9 7 0 0
2021 2.0 0.7 2 4 0
2020 0.4 0.4 2 0 0
2019 3.0 0.7 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · TX · Houston

705 Reinforcing steel contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westco Iron Works 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beitzel Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilmar 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR S&R Enterprises, LLC 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blount Fine Foods 410 FTE
STATE-SIZE HMH - JFK 410 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1148 410 FTE
STATE-SIZE RCSNTXTL - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 410 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Coatings and Adhesives Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Automation Solutions, Inc 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Nebraska Medicine Fire Watch 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Chemtrade Solutions LLC East St. Louis 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Blistex 410 FTE
NAT-SIZE OSHA 300A - Michigan 410 FTE
NAT-SIZE S03930 - Southern Sanitation 410 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 410 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.