Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing · Indiana

NISCO-Topeka

Topeka, IN · ~564 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

NISCO-Topeka runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

NISCO-Topeka: 1.8 TCR = 53% of Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

NISCO-Topeka safety composite

NISCO-Topeka scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

NISCO-Topeka: 0.9 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.31× in 2024

NISCO-Topeka's TCR rose 0.7 from 0.9 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326291 · Topeka, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #6/20
  • PHOTO Engineered Materials…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 83 inj
  • SIZE ~564 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Engineered Materials : Syracuse (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

NISCO-Topeka in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows NISCO-Topeka averages 1.8 TCR (53% of the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

NISCO-Topeka TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where NISCO-Topeka falls in its industry

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 20 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., employers in Indiana.

NISCO-Topeka (564 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate NISCO-Topeka
NISCO-Topeka (564 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 3.6

NISCO-Topeka has more employees than the Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.6 9 0 0
2023 3.1 2.7 15 2 0
2022 2.2 2.0 11 1 0
2021 2.5 2.3 13 0 0
2020 2.5 1.5 11 1 0
2019 1.3 0.6 6 3 0
2018 0.8 0.4 6 0 0
2017 0.7 0.4 5 0 0
2016 0.9 0.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326291 · IN · Topeka

266 Mechanical rubber goods (i.e., extruded, lathe-cut, molded) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 25 employers in Topeka, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Engineered Materials : Syracuse 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lanxess Corporation-RheinChemie Additives 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SGPPL-Portage 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hutchinson Aerospace & Industry 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Harrison County Hospital 563 FTE
STATE-SIZE ININD313 ASCENSION ST. VINCENT WOMEN S HOSPITAL 563 FTE
STATE-SIZE Family & Social Services Administration (00405) 565 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advics Manufacturing Indiana 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Champion Topeka 538 FTE
CITY-NEAR Champion Home Builders, Inc. 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starcraft 378 FTE
CITY-NEAR CrossRoads Plant 522 165 FTE
NAT-TCR MCPS-Moses Cone Physician Svc Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunbright Services 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Houston - BMD 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rehabilitation Institute of Denton, LLC (d/b/a Select Rehabilitation Hospital of Denton) 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roadclipper Enterprise Inc. 564 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mariani Nut Company 564 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jordan Carriers 564 FTE
NAT-SIZE INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA - Chocolate Bayou Works 564 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.