Food banks · Kentucky
Dare to Care Food Bank
Louisville, KY · ~61 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 4.9
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Dare to Care Food Bank runs at 128% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food banks workplace, earning a grade D.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 4.9
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.8
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 8
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Dare to Care Food Bank's OSHA Total Case Rate of 4.9 to the Food banks BLS benchmark of 3.8 (128% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Dare to Care Food Bank's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.
Where Dare to Care Food Bank falls in its industry
162 Food banks establishmentsSafer than 43% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.
Trend analysis for Dare to Care Food Bank
Between 2019 and 2021, Dare to Care Food Bank's Total Case Rate improved from 6.0 to 4.9 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 18% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2020, at a TCR of 3.7, while 2019 saw the highest rate, at 6.0, a spread of 2.2 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 3 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 3 reporting years, Dare to Care Food Bank recorded 8 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 8 injuries shown on this page for Dare to Care Food Bank are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 624210 - Food banks.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2021)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 123,003 hours worked = 3.25 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Dare to Care Food Bank (this establishment) | 4.87 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Food banks industry avg | 3.80 | BLS IIF, NAICS 624210 |
| Kentucky state avg (all industries) | 4.39 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Dare to Care Food Bank to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2021: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2020: 2 reportable incidents · 2 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2019: 3 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4.9 | 3.3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3.7 | 0.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Dare to Care Food Bank's reported OSHA injury record versus its Food banks peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 128% of the Food banks benchmark, Dare to Care Food Bank reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Food banks sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Dare to Care Food Bank's safety grade?
How many injuries has Dare to Care Food Bank reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Kentucky, and by nearby establishments in Louisville - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~4.9)
Similar size (~61 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.