Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing · Michigan

Dart Container MTM

Mason, MI · ~200 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dart Container MTM runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Dart Container MTM: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dart Container MTM safety composite

Dart Container MTM scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2024

Dart Container MTM injury rate improved

Dart Container MTM's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.7 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Mason, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/42
  • PHOTO American Maplan Corp…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~200 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: American Maplan Corporation dba batenfeld-cincinnati USA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Dart Container MTM in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dart Container MTM averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dart Container MTM TCR series: 2016=2.7 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Dart Container MTM falls in its industry

448 Thermoforming machinery for pl establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 42 Thermoforming machinery for pl employers in Michigan.

Dart Container MTM (200 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Dart Container MTM
Dart Container MTM (200 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Dart Container MTM has more employees than the Thermoforming machinery for plastics man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2020 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2019 1.2 0.8 3 0 0
2018 1.4 0.9 3 0 0
2017 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2016 2.7 0.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · MI · Mason

448 Thermoforming machinery for plastics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 35 employers in Mason, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR American Maplan Corporation dba batenfeld-cincinnati USA 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Syzygy Plasmonics 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABEC - Bethlehem 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawson Screen Products, Inc. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grand Rapids Bouma Corporation 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid-American Group 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mall City Mechanical 200 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flexco Grand Rapids-Walker 200 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ingham County 1,451 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dart Container Corporate Offices 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gestamp Mason 525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dart Container Engineering 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Lonza Portsmouth 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Varian, Las Vegas 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR PALM 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Baltimore-Martin State Airport (1108) 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mount Carmel Franklinton 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lawson Products-McCook DC 200 FTE
NAT-SIZE Starcon - South 200 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.