Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing · Florida

Dart Container Plant City

Plant City, FL · ~319 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dart Container Plant City runs at 69% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Dart Container Plant City: 2.3 TCR = 69% of Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dart Container Plant City safety composite

Dart Container Plant City scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2024

Dart Container Plant City injury rate improved

Dart Container Plant City's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.8 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.8 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326140 · Plant City, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 69% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/10
  • PHOTO Atlas Molded Products
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~319 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atlas Molded Products (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Dart Container Plant City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dart Container Plant City averages 2.3 TCR (69% of the Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dart Container Plant City TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Dart Container Plant City falls in its industry

260 Cups, polystyrene foam, manufa establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 10 Cups, polystyrene foam, manufa employers in Florida.

Dart Container Plant City (319 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Dart Container Plant City
Dart Container Plant City (319 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Dart Container Plant City has more employees than the Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 0.0 5 0 0
2023 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.7 0.3 2 0 0
2021 1.9 0.4 5 0 0
2020 3.4 2.3 9 0 0
2019 2.6 1.1 9 0 0
2018 3.9 1.0 15 0 0
2017 2.6 0.9 11 0 0
2016 2.8 0.9 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326140 · FL · Plant City

260 Cups, polystyrene foam, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 135 employers in Plant City, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atlas Molded Products 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atlas Molded Products a Division of Atlas Roofing Corporation 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Triad EPS Plant 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Storopack, Inc.- Cincinnati Service Center 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 4444 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1916 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veritiv Operating Company - FL101 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miami Cancer Institute 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Florida Baptist Hospital (5105) 999 FTE
CITY-NEAR FL-PLANT01 703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant City 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant City - F040 502 FTE
NAT-TCR Juliette Fowler Communities 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR King Erectors, Inc. 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR R Henry Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Towne Place Buffalo 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE ORBIS Urbana 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heath Village 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE 01 Gob 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE Havco Wood Products, LLC 319 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.