Skilled nursing facilities · South Carolina

Lake Emory Post Acute Care

Inman, SC · ~83 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lake Emory Post Acute Care runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lake Emory Post Acute Care: 18.1 TCR = 278% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lake Emory Post Acute Care safety composite

Lake Emory Post Acute Care scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−20.9

2016→2024

Lake Emory Post Acute Care injury rate improved

Lake Emory Post Acute Care's TCR fell 20.9 from 20.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 49.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.9 · 2017=21.4 · 2018=17.4 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=49.0 · 2021=19.0 · 2022=27.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Inman, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.1 · 278% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #153/165
  • PHOTO Palo Alto Sub-Acute …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 63 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Palo Alto Sub-Acute and Rehabilitation Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lake Emory Post Acute Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lake Emory Post Acute Care averages 18.1 TCR (278% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lake Emory Post Acute Care TCR series: 2016=20.9 · 2017=21.4 · 2018=17.4 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=49 · 2021=19 · 2022=27.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Lake Emory Post Acute Care falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #153 safest of 165 Skilled nursing facilities employers in South Carolina.

Lake Emory Post Acute Care (83 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lake Emory Post Acute Care
Lake Emory Post Acute Care (83 employees, TCR 18.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Lake Emory Post Acute Care has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 27.5 27.5 5 9 0
2021 19.0 19.0 2 9 0
2020 49.0 47.6 9 25 0
2019 7.5 6.0 5 0 0
2018 17.4 9.5 11 0 0
2017 21.4 18.6 15 0 0
2016 20.9 17.0 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · SC · Inman

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 29 employers in Inman, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Palo Alto Sub-Acute and Rehabilitation Center 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR DAWSON HEALTH AND REHAB 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Generations at Peoria, LLC 18.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boulevard Terrace Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 18.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenville SC Branch 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Charleston South Carolina Facility 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oxco, Inc. 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Android Industries- Greenville 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enoree Complex 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mack Molding Company - Inman, SC 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAYBROOK PLANT 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR IWG High Performance Conductors - Inman 248 FTE
NAT-TCR Tallahassee Nurseries, Inc. 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Glasswater Creek of Lafayette LLC 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Village Health Facility for Children and Young Adults 18.1 TCR
NAT-TCR S&H Delivery LLC 18.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tentcraft LLC 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tonna Mechanical Inc 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Libertyville-AGSCO 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Willimantic Waste - Sprague 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.