Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing · Florida

Dayton-Granger, Inc.

Fort Lauderdale, FL · ~149 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dayton-Granger, Inc. runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Dayton-Granger, Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 98% of Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dayton-Granger, Inc. safety composite

Dayton-Granger, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dayton-Granger, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Dayton-Granger, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 4.4 in 2016 to 4.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=2.0 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3.0 · 2023=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Fort Lauderdale, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 98% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #36/38
  • PHOTO 2017 300
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~149 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2017 300 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Dayton-Granger, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dayton-Granger, Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (98% of the Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dayton-Granger, Inc. TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=2 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=2 · 2020=3.5 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3 · 2023=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Dayton-Granger, Inc. falls in its industry

388 Search and detection systems a establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #36 safest of 38 Search and detection systems a employers in Florida.

Dayton-Granger, Inc. (149 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Dayton-Granger, Inc.
Dayton-Granger, Inc. (149 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Dayton-Granger, Inc. has fewer employees than the Search and detection systems and instrum median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.1 0.7 6 0 0
2022 3.0 0.8 4 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 4 0 0
2020 3.5 1.7 4 0 0
2019 2.0 1.4 3 0 0
2018 3.3 0.0 5 0 0
2017 2.0 0.0 3 0 0
2016 4.4 1.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · FL · Fort Lauderdale

388 Search and detection systems and instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 374 employers in Fort Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2017 300 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primus Aerospace-MD 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Undersea Sensor Systems Inc 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brogdon Machine Inc 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Orlando West 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE System Service & Engineering, LLC 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeastern Metals Company (SEMCO) - (aka Gibraltar Industries) 149 FTE
STATE-SIZE Techno Coatings, Inc. - North Miami 149 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Airlines - FLL 3,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Long Term Care Inc 2,979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Lauderdale (FLL) 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hotwire Communications - Cypress 953 FTE
NAT-TCR Unit #2338 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 1203 - Van Buren Township Mi (Dry) Depot 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 100640 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeland School Dist * 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Franz Bakery- Nampa 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Centurion - 01 (Howell, MI) 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Life Science - Dallas 149 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2677 149 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.