Sonar systems and equipment manufacturing · Indiana

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc

Columbia City, IN · ~527 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sonar systems and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc: 3.2 TCR = 96% of Sonar systems and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc safety composite

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2024

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc injury rate improved

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc's TCR fell 4.5 from 5.4 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.9 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Columbia City, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 96% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #5/6
  • PHOTO Primus Aerospace-MD
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 66 inj
  • SIZE ~527 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primus Aerospace-MD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Undersea Sensor Systems Inc averages 3.2 TCR (96% of the Sonar systems and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.9 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Undersea Sensor Systems Inc falls in its industry

388 Sonar systems and equipment ma establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 6 Sonar systems and equipment ma employers in Indiana.

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc (527 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Undersea Sensor Systems Inc
Undersea Sensor Systems Inc (527 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Undersea Sensor Systems Inc has more employees than the Sonar systems and equipment manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 6 0 0
2022 1.9 0.6 8 4 0
2021 1.2 0.9 6 1 0
2020 1.8 1.6 4 5 0
2019 5.6 4.5 13 12 0
2018 3.3 2.4 9 5 0
2017 5.3 3.6 11 11 0
2016 5.4 4.4 9 12 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · IN · Columbia City

388 Sonar systems and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 67 employers in Columbia City, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primus Aerospace-MD 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2017 300 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mount Prospect, IL 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dayton-Granger, Inc. 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Smith Brothers of Berne 527 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems 528 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steel Warehouse Company LLC 526 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lear Corporation - Columbia City 529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Structural and Rail 944 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics Structural & Rail Division 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR Micropulse, Inc. 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whitley Memorial Hospital 340 FTE
NAT-TCR Quality By Design, Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedarwood Enviromental Services 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tri-City United High School 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ATI Performance Products 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cartersville Brewery 527 FTE
NAT-SIZE Va. Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services 527 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodrich Corporation (Jamestown ND) 527 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williamsburg Brewery 527 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.