Health club facilities, physical fitness · Arizona

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa

Scottsdale, AZ · ~195 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa runs at 228% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Health club facilities, physical fitness workplace, earning a grade F.

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa: 7.1 TCR = 228% of Health club facilities, physical fitness BLS 3.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa safety composite

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2020→2023

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa injury rate improved

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa's TCR fell 8.2 from 9.3 in 2020 to 1.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=9.3 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713940 · Scottsdale, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 228% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/20
  • PHOTO 47 Capitola
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~195 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 47 Capitola (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa averages 7.1 TCR (228% of the Health club facilities, physical fitness BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa TCR series: 2020=9.3 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=1.2 · BLS 3.1

Where DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa falls in its industry

629 Health club facilities, physic establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 20 Health club facilities, physic employers in Arizona.

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa (195 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa
DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa (195 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

DC Ranch Village Health Club & Spa has more employees than the Health club facilities, physical fitness median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 9.3 6.6 6 1 0
2021 8.4 4.2 4 0 0
2020 9.3 3.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713940 · AZ · Scottsdale

629 Health club facilities, physical fitness employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 531 employers in Scottsdale, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 47 Capitola 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 54 Dover 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transmountain 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Club Fitness -Maplewood 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE DH Pace Company Inc dba Overhead Door Company of Central Arizona 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairlife 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE FedEx 3601 E COLUMBIA 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE TMX2087 - PHOENIX CONTACT CENTER 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR Educational Services LLC 6,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Scottsdale 4,077 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHEA MEDICAL CTR CAMPUS 2,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPPORT SERVICES CAMPUS 2,800 FTE
NAT-TCR Village of Rosemont 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Justice Quality Foods #2 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR North America : Denver 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Moore Lumber - Ayer Store Location 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Coastal 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Enerpac Columbus Operations 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trinity Village Inc 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skanska-Ecco III-HPA JV 90007820 Hunts Point 195 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.