Heavy trucks assembly on chassis of own manufacture · Wisconsin

Defense Logistics Service Center

Oshkosh, WI · ~63 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Defense Logistics Service Center runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heavy trucks assembly on chassis of own manufacture workplace, earning a grade C.

Defense Logistics Service Center: 3.0 TCR = 92% of Heavy trucks assembly on chassis of own manufacture BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Defense Logistics Service Center safety composite

Defense Logistics Service Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2016→2021

Defense Logistics Service Center injury rate improved

Defense Logistics Service Center's TCR fell 2.2 from 7.3 in 2016 to 5.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.3 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336120 · Oshkosh, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #18/29
  • PHOTO IPP Plant
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IPP Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Defense Logistics Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Defense Logistics Service Center averages 3.0 TCR (92% of the Heavy trucks assembly on chassis of own manufacture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Defense Logistics Service Center TCR series: 2016=7.3 · 2017=0 · 2019=2.7 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Defense Logistics Service Center falls in its industry

124 Heavy trucks assembly on chass establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 29 Heavy trucks assembly on chass employers in Wisconsin.

Defense Logistics Service Center (63 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Defense Logistics Service Center
Defense Logistics Service Center (63 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 223 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Defense Logistics Service Center has fewer employees than the Heavy trucks assembly on chassis of own median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.2 3.4 6 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 7.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336120 · WI · Oshkosh

124 Heavy trucks assembly on chassis of own manufacture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 206 employers in Oshkosh, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IPP Plant 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Built 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EONE 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR T&T Sales Inc. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Insight FS - Jefferson 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miltrim Farms Inc. 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barron Live Haul 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clifford A Chier Resource Center 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Medical Center Oshkosh 1,433 FTE
CITY-NEAR CR Meyer and Sons Co. 1,303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bemis North America - Office 807 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrison Street 738 FTE
NAT-TCR Main Center - Terre Haute 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Indiana University Health Paoli Hospital 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 49441e - N Palm Springs 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dormie Club 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Solstice Senior Living at Sun City West 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE PPC Lubricants, LLC - Butler 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Corporate Graphics South - 0077-FLMA1 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE SHU 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.